stop oldbury
Labels
Aldermaston
(1)
Anglesey
(1)
anti-nuclear music
(1)
Australia
(2)
Baltic
(1)
Belarus
(1)
Belgium
(1)
Bristol
(1)
canada
(2)
Chernobyl
(16)
Chomsky
(1)
climate change
(2)
depleted uranium bombs
(2)
earthquakes in UK
(1)
EDF
(5)
Finland
(5)
France
(28)
Fukushima
(1)
Germany
(7)
Greenpeace
(3)
Hinkley
(18)
India
(27)
infant leukemia
(4)
Italy
(3)
Japan
(22)
Jonathon Porritt
(3)
Kazakstan
(1)
Kyrgyzstan
(2)
Lovelock
(1)
Niger
(1)
Nuclear banks
(2)
nuclear conferences
(1)
Nuclear decommissioning
(1)
nuclear economics
(5)
nuclear horror
(1)
nuclear new build
(23)
Nuclear non-proliferation treaty
(1)
nuclear police
(1)
nuclear rennaissance
(2)
Nuclear research
(1)
nuclear secrets
(1)
nuclear submarines
(2)
nuclear subsidies
(3)
nuclear titanic
(1)
nuclear trains
(5)
nuclear waste
(13)
nuclear weapons
(4)
nucler accidents
(1)
Obama
(1)
oldbury nuclear power station
(14)
pakistan
(2)
Plutonium contamination
(1)
radioactive cloud
(2)
radioactive shipwrecks
(4)
radioactive waste
(7)
renewable energy
(2)
Russia
(5)
Saudi Arabia
(1)
Sellafield
(9)
Sizewell
(6)
Sizewell; Chernobyl
(3)
Spain
(2)
stop hinkley
(10)
Torness
(1)
uranium mining
(4)
US
(3)
Wylfa
(1)
Oldbury Proposed Cooling Towers
Followers
Blog Archive
►
2015
(12)
►
July
(1)
►
Jul 01
(1)
►
June
(1)
►
Jun 02
(1)
►
May
(1)
►
May 01
(1)
►
April
(4)
►
Apr 29
(1)
►
Apr 21
(1)
►
Apr 19
(2)
►
March
(5)
►
Mar 13
(5)
►
2014
(3)
►
November
(3)
►
Nov 08
(3)
►
2013
(21)
►
November
(4)
►
Nov 21
(1)
►
Nov 18
(1)
►
Nov 17
(1)
►
Nov 07
(1)
►
October
(9)
►
Oct 24
(1)
►
Oct 22
(1)
►
Oct 21
(1)
►
Oct 18
(3)
►
Oct 09
(1)
►
Oct 01
(2)
►
September
(1)
►
Sept 30
(1)
►
June
(1)
►
Jun 20
(1)
►
May
(1)
►
May 28
(1)
►
February
(1)
►
Feb 02
(1)
►
January
(4)
►
Jan 30
(1)
►
Jan 27
(1)
►
Jan 24
(1)
►
Jan 21
(1)
►
2012
(32)
►
December
(5)
►
Dec 20
(1)
►
Dec 18
(1)
►
Dec 16
(1)
►
Dec 09
(1)
►
Dec 04
(1)
►
November
(8)
►
Nov 30
(1)
►
Nov 26
(2)
►
Nov 12
(2)
►
Nov 09
(1)
►
Nov 01
(2)
►
October
(6)
►
Oct 28
(1)
►
Oct 24
(1)
►
Oct 18
(1)
►
Oct 15
(1)
►
Oct 01
(2)
►
September
(2)
►
Sept 28
(1)
►
Sept 20
(1)
►
August
(1)
►
Aug 18
(1)
►
March
(2)
►
Mar 22
(1)
►
Mar 13
(1)
►
February
(7)
►
Feb 18
(1)
►
Feb 12
(1)
►
Feb 09
(1)
►
Feb 08
(1)
►
Feb 04
(1)
►
Feb 02
(1)
►
Feb 01
(1)
►
January
(1)
►
Jan 17
(1)
▼
2011
(104)
►
December
(1)
►
Dec 06
(1)
►
November
(2)
►
Nov 22
(2)
►
October
(6)
►
Oct 21
(2)
►
Oct 18
(1)
►
Oct 14
(1)
►
Oct 09
(2)
►
September
(7)
►
Sept 28
(1)
►
Sept 21
(1)
►
Sept 20
(3)
►
Sept 16
(1)
►
Sept 13
(1)
►
August
(4)
►
Aug 08
(1)
►
Aug 07
(1)
►
Aug 02
(2)
►
July
(9)
►
Jul 23
(1)
►
Jul 19
(2)
►
Jul 17
(1)
►
Jul 06
(2)
►
Jul 04
(1)
►
Jul 03
(2)
►
June
(3)
►
Jun 29
(2)
►
Jun 15
(1)
►
May
(13)
►
May 31
(1)
►
May 29
(3)
►
May 24
(3)
►
May 17
(1)
►
May 15
(1)
►
May 10
(1)
►
May 06
(3)
►
April
(24)
►
Apr 28
(4)
►
Apr 25
(1)
►
Apr 24
(2)
►
Apr 22
(2)
►
Apr 19
(2)
►
Apr 14
(3)
►
Apr 12
(1)
►
Apr 11
(2)
►
Apr 10
(1)
►
Apr 09
(1)
►
Apr 05
(1)
►
Apr 04
(3)
►
Apr 02
(1)
►
March
(25)
►
Mar 31
(1)
►
Mar 29
(1)
►
Mar 28
(3)
►
Mar 27
(2)
►
Mar 24
(6)
►
Mar 21
(4)
►
Mar 20
(1)
►
Mar 19
(1)
►
Mar 15
(2)
►
Mar 13
(2)
►
Mar 10
(1)
►
Mar 02
(1)
►
February
(4)
►
Feb 17
(3)
►
Feb 06
(1)
▼
January
(6)
►
Jan 26
(2)
►
Jan 22
(1)
►
Jan 17
(2)
▼
Jan 16
(1)
Green investment bank could help to build nuclear ...
►
2010
(132)
►
December
(12)
►
Dec 23
(1)
►
Dec 17
(2)
►
Dec 13
(1)
►
Dec 09
(2)
►
Dec 06
(2)
►
Dec 04
(2)
►
Dec 01
(2)
►
November
(8)
►
Nov 30
(2)
►
Nov 28
(1)
►
Nov 17
(3)
►
Nov 16
(2)
►
October
(5)
►
Oct 13
(1)
►
Oct 11
(1)
►
Oct 09
(1)
►
Oct 05
(1)
►
Oct 01
(1)
►
September
(4)
►
Sept 23
(3)
►
Sept 01
(1)
►
August
(3)
►
Aug 25
(2)
►
Aug 07
(1)
►
July
(10)
►
Jul 28
(1)
►
Jul 26
(1)
►
Jul 21
(2)
►
Jul 16
(3)
►
Jul 13
(1)
►
Jul 05
(2)
►
June
(13)
►
Jun 21
(1)
►
Jun 20
(2)
►
Jun 15
(2)
►
Jun 14
(1)
►
Jun 09
(3)
►
Jun 08
(1)
►
Jun 01
(3)
►
May
(27)
►
May 29
(1)
►
May 27
(1)
►
May 20
(2)
►
May 19
(2)
►
May 17
(4)
►
May 16
(4)
►
May 13
(2)
►
May 07
(5)
►
May 02
(6)
►
April
(28)
►
Apr 28
(4)
►
Apr 27
(2)
►
Apr 26
(3)
►
Apr 25
(7)
►
Apr 24
(2)
►
Apr 22
(1)
►
Apr 19
(1)
►
Apr 17
(1)
►
Apr 13
(2)
►
Apr 12
(1)
►
Apr 09
(2)
►
Apr 05
(2)
►
March
(5)
►
Mar 30
(2)
►
Mar 21
(2)
►
Mar 10
(1)
►
February
(7)
►
Feb 26
(1)
►
Feb 25
(1)
►
Feb 20
(1)
►
Feb 16
(1)
►
Feb 14
(1)
►
Feb 07
(1)
►
Feb 04
(1)
►
January
(10)
►
Jan 29
(1)
►
Jan 28
(2)
►
Jan 26
(1)
►
Jan 24
(1)
►
Jan 23
(2)
►
Jan 06
(2)
►
Jan 01
(1)
►
2009
(17)
►
December
(17)
►
Dec 28
(3)
►
Dec 24
(1)
►
Dec 22
(1)
►
Dec 21
(2)
►
Dec 19
(1)
►
Dec 18
(2)
►
Dec 16
(1)
►
Dec 14
(1)
►
Dec 13
(2)
►
Dec 10
(1)
►
Dec 09
(1)
►
Dec 03
(1)
About Me
Angela Paine
View my complete profile
Sunday, 16 January 2011
Green investment bank could help to build nuclear reactors
The Conservatives' pre-election manifesto promised that the bank would finance 'new green technology start-ups'
Thursday 13 January 2011 10.13 GMT
Green MP Caroline Lucas said funding for new nuclear reactors made a mockery of the idea of the Green Investment Bank. Photograph: David Levene for the Guardian The government's
Green Investment Bank
could fund the building of new nuclear reactors, it has emerged. It is the latest form of public financial support on offer to the industry from the government which continues to insist that the industry will not receive any more subsidies. The Conservatives' pre-election manifesto promised that the Green Investment Bank – which was also in the coalition agreement – would finance "new green technology start-ups". But documents issued before Christmas by Vince Cable's business department list new reactors, along with offshore wind farms and new electricity grids, as one of the three proposed "target sectors" on which the bank would initially focus. Justine Greening MP, the economic secretary to the Treasury, appeared before the Commons environmental audit committee yesterday and denied that financial backing from a publicly funded bank would amount to a subsidy for the
nuclear power
industry. Caroline Lucas, the Green party MP who sits on the committee, said: "Nuclear is not green in my view. But it's not new in anyone's mind. Funding nuclear makes a mockery of the whole idea of a Green Investment Bank and even indirect support – such as cheaper taxpayer-backed loans offered by a bank – still amounts to a subsidy." Greening also dodged questions about whether the bank would be able to make billions of pounds of cheap loans or act as a more limited fund. The Treasury is concerned that borrowings would add to the government's deficit. "I am not going to be hung up on semantics," she told the committee, telling them that a decision had not yet been made and that there were also other ways to encourage green investment. She also refused to be drawn on how much more effective a fully functional bank would be in encouraging the estimated £450bn investment needed by 2025 for the UK to meet ambitious carbon reduction and environmental targets. Senior coalition sources said civil servants who wrote the documents decided to include nuclear as a low carbon form of generation that could potentially receive funding in order to be thorough. They had not been instructed to do so by ministers, it is understood. A spokesman for the business department insisted that no final decision had been made on whether the Green Investment Bank would provide financial support for the nuclear industry. If it did, it would add to a growing list of government help for the industry, including guarantees of a minimum carbon floor price, caps on nuclear waste liabilities and a possible new "low-carbon obligation" which would guarantee a higher price for the electricity reactors generate. In
an interview with the Guardian last month
, Chris Huhne, the energy and climate change secretary, maintained that there will be no "support specific for nuclear for the very simple reason that it is an old and mature technology". He added: "The economic rationale for providing extra subsidy for something relies on it being an infant technology which has not come yet to commercial scale." Greening said that the model for a Green Investment Bank should be decided by May and that it would be operational in 2012. Ernst & Young estimates that traditional sources of capital such as energy companies and infrastructure finance could only provide up to £80bn of the £450bn investment needed by 2025, arguing that only a fully operational bank can fill the gap. Huhne, who together with environmentalists is pushing for a bank which can borrow and lend, admitted last month that" a fully fledged bank will take time to set up" particularly given the coalition's overriding priority of cutting the deficit. He suggested the idea that the bank could initially start off in a more limited capacity to kick-start investment as soon as possible but insisted that he wanted a bank set up as soon as possible.
Newer Posts
Older Posts
Home
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)